Scale · founder · 6 min read
Cursor Is Now Part of the X Subscription. Here's Who Should Switch
On October 12, X, Grok and Cursor became one monthly plan from $8 to $200. What each tier gets you, what it quietly changes, and who should stay put.
On October 12, SpaceXSI announced The X Subscription: one monthly plan that bundles Grok, Grok Bot, X Premium and Cursor. If you use Cursor, this is the first time your editor’s price has been tied to a social network’s subscription tiers. That is a strange sentence to write, and it’s real.
The short version: it is a good deal for some people and a trap for others, and the difference comes down to which AI models you actually use inside Cursor.
What was announced
There are five tiers, priced monthly. Annual billing, per the pricing docs, takes a bit off.
- Free ($0): daily Grok access and a starter allowance for Cursor coding agents.
- Plus ($8): more AI usage in Grok and Cursor, plus the X checkmark and creator tools.
- Premium ($30): the benefits of SuperGrok, Cursor Pro and X Premium+. X says those cost $90 a month if bought separately.
- Super ($100): everything above with 15x the usage of Plus.
- Ultra ($200): 50x the usage of Plus.
Premium sits at 4x Plus. Team seats cost the same per seat as the individual tiers ($30, $100 or $200), and Plus isn’t offered for teams. Enterprise buyers get a single dashboard and have to talk to sales.
The part that matters: one shared pool, and it’s built around Grok
All paid tiers draw from a single pool of Grok model usage, shared across the Grok apps, the Grok tab on X and Cursor. X says each paid plan includes at least twice as much coding usage with Grok models as the comparable Cursor plan.
Read that carefully. The extra usage is for Grok models. The docs say third-party models in Cursor, which means the Claude and GPT models many of you use today, are not part of the included pool. They draw on Additional Usage credits from the first request.
That is a real change from how a standard Cursor plan has worked. If you’ve been happily running Claude inside Cursor Pro, switching means those requests become metered credits on top of your $30. Neither the announcement nor the docs publish dollar or request figures per tier, only the multipliers, so you can’t calculate your cost in advance.
Who should consider switching
You are a good candidate if you already pay for more than one of these things. Someone paying for Cursor Pro at $20, SuperGrok and X Premium+ separately is the obvious winner at $30. Even if you drop the X part entirely, you’re paying $10 more than Cursor alone to get Grok chat, voice and image generation included.
You’re also a candidate if you’re curious about Grok’s coding models and want more of them per dollar. Grok has been improving quickly (we covered the latest in Grok 4.6), and a cheaper way to try it inside the editor you already use is attractive.
Who should stay put
If Claude or GPT is your daily model in Cursor, stay where you are until you’ve tested this. Your current plan keeps working: existing Cursor, SuperGrok and X Premium subscribers keep their plan, price and features unless they choose to switch.
Also stay put if you’re an Enterprise or Teams customer with negotiated terms. The “3x more coding usage than older Cursor Teams” claim is compared against list pricing, not your contract.
How to test it without getting burned
Switching cancels your old plan and issues a prorated refund for unused time. The new plan is charged in full up front and the refund arrives separately, which can take a few days. If you bought Cursor through the Apple App Store, switching does not cancel it, so you have to cancel in your device settings yourself and ask Apple for the refund.
Before you move, do this:
- Screenshot your current Cursor usage page so you know what a normal month looks like.
- Note what share of your requests go to non-Grok models. That share is what turns into metered credits.
- Start on a monthly Premium plan, not annual, and set a spending cap on top-ups.
- Run one real week of work, then compare.
The bigger picture
Cursor has been owned by SpaceX since June (we covered the acquisition closing), and this bundle is the clearest sign yet of what that means in practice: Cursor becomes a distribution channel for Grok, priced to pull you into the family. That’s not automatically bad. Bundles can be cheap. But it does mean the default model mix inside your editor is now a business decision, not just a technical one.
If your tool’s pricing and model access can change because of a deal made above its head, that’s one more reason to keep your code in a repo you control and your prompts portable. The pricing calendar tracks every dated change we can verify across tools.
Bottom line: if you were already paying for Cursor Pro and Grok, take a look. If you’re a Claude-in-Cursor person, wait and test.
Sources: x.ai announcement, X Subscription pricing docs, Engadget.
Related guides
intermediate · 10 min read
Best AI Code Editors in 2026: Cursor, Windsurf, Trae, and More Ranked
We ranked every serious AI code editor for 2026: Cursor, Windsurf, Trae, GitHub Copilot, and Cline, with honest tradeoffs and no hedged verdicts.
founder · 7 min read
Anthropic's June 15 Billing Change: What It Means If You Build With Claude
On June 15, Anthropic splits interactive and programmatic usage into separate pools. Here's what changes, and what doesn't, if you don't write code.
founder · 8 min read
Claude Fable 5.1: The Price Cut Hiding Behind an Unchanged Price Tag
Anthropic kept Fable's sticker price identical and cut the real cost 25-45%. Why your tool bill may move before your tool announces anything.
Enjoying this guide?
Get weekly practical guides, plus tool updates and implementation playbooks.